Aug 30

Apple’s Anuj Nayar tells us that the company used to publish all three scores on its site, but highlighted the highway test. Now, the highway test and DVD playback tests are out, and the wireless productivity test is the new default. So looking at Apple’s older numbers is a bit like comparing you-know-what to oranges.

Both Ars Technica and Gizmodo pointed out that Apple’s own numbers on how long the battery should last in a 17-inch MacBook Pro have changed with the new models–going from more than 5 hours to only 4.5 hours.

Battery numbers should always be taken with a fairly hefty grain of salt–your laptop’s battery life is highly dependent on how you use it, from applications to screen brightness to USB-powered peripherals. We’ll know more when we get our hands on one of these new models and run it through our own testing, so stay tuned.

Apple says it’s changed the way it reports battery life. It used to report numbers from three stock battery life tests, a so-called “highway” test, designed for maximum battery life, a DVD playback test (similar to what CNET uses), and a wireless productivity test.

Some conflicting accounts coming out of the Web-o-sphere on Tuesday about Apple’s revamped MacBook Pro laptops. At the heart of the controversy are reports that the new 15- and 17-inch Pro models have taken a nosedive on battery life, despite the inclusion of allegedly power-saving Intel Penryn processors.

(Credit:
Apple)

There are actually a couple of different things going on here, all of which add up to new MacBooks that should last just as long as their predecessors, if not a little longer.

On the other hand, the new Penryn processors and optional LED backlit display (17-inch Pro only) should offer some advantages in battery life.

Aug 24

(Credit:
CNET News)

(Credit:
CNET News)

The Google Chrome Channel Chooser lets people get the latest updates to Google's Web browser.

Through a new developer program, Google is letting people try the latest versions of its Chrome Web browser, and the first update is available.

The newest Chrome version is 0.2.152.1.

The first update available through the program, build 1251, is geared more for programmers and willing guinea pigs than for those who merely are curious.

My update to version 0.2.152.1 went smoothly–but afterward, the browser couldn’t figure out whether another version was available. Instead, it said “checking for updates…” for a few minutes until I closed the dialog box.

Those who want the newest Chrome versions can install the Google Chrome Channel Chooser software from Google’s Chrome Dev Channel site. The switcher lets people choose whether they want the latest cutting-edge Chrome builds or the less frequent but more stable beta versions.

Build 1251 fixes bugs with areas including Microsoft’s Silverlight software, tab behavior, video playback with YouTube and other Flash players, and scalable vector graphics, and it suppresses full-text indexing of sites accessed with encrypted Web connections, according to the release notes. It also enables two switches that can be set when the software boots that let users activate two developmental features, new technology for networking and for managing Chrome windows.

Such submissions require programmers to extend copyright to Google, which means Google can have its way with the Chrome code, for example changing the open-source license under which it’s offered.

How to update
After running the Google Chrome Channel Chooser software, users can find if there’s a new version by clicking the wrench icon in the upper-right corner of the Chrome screen, then selecting “About Google Chrome.” If a new version is available, users can update there, then reboot restart to enable the changes.

“Google Chrome now provides a way for people to get early-access releases automatically: the Dev channel,” said Chrome Program Manager Mark Larson in a Chrome mailing list posting late Monday night. “The Dev channel lets you test the latest fixes and get access to new features as they’re being developed. We will release new builds to the Dev channel about every week so that you can preview–and provide feedback on–what’s coming in Google Chrome.”

The 'About Google Chrome' dialog box lets people update to the latest version.

Also, either Google is still hiding details of security-related Chrome fixes in the release notes, or some of the links are missing in the release notes.

(Credit:
CNET News)

Chrome is an open-source project, meaning that Google may draw on other work from Firefox, WebKit, and Microsoft, and that others may help Google. Judging by a couple of “thank yous” in the release notes, outsiders are in fact starting to submit patches.

Aug 21

Dana is willing to believe that VMware’s new Microsoft-esque CEO may be able to “turn things around with a proprietary strategy…[demonstrating] that management was to blame,” but he doesn’t seem to think this is likely.

OStatic is even more emphatic that VMware was living on borrowed time as open-source vendors like Red Hat, Novell, and Sun embed virtualization technology into their operating systems: “Virtualization, is, at its core, headed for software utility status, and will likely be wrapped into operating systems, and increasingly adopted in open source form for free.”

commentary

My colleague, James Urquhart, pinged me tonight to suggest that “Management is where its at. VMWare has good technology there (see B-Hive), but they only do it for their stuff.” This is perhaps sustainable if VMware had a way to embed its technology everywhere, but arguably the operating system vendors are much better positioned to do this, and it will be their management offerings that encroach upon and eventually take VMware’s market position.

It was great while it lasted, VMware. Who knows? Maybe it can last a few more years. But I wouldn’t bank on it. Neither, apparently, would Wall Street.

A range of great analyses today of what went wrong with VMware. In case you missed it, the company lost 25 percent of its market valuation and a CEO. Many are suggesting that pressure from open source is the culprit, and it seems a very plausible rationale.

Aug 20

According to CrunchGear the new iPhone will come in red, supporting the Product Red campaign.

More here from CrunchGear.

Stay tuned for CNET News.com’s Tom Krazit’s live coverage from Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference and CEO Steve Jobs’ unveiling of the iPhone that will be coveted by every current iPhone user.

CrunchGear has a spread on what appears to be the new 3G
iPhone. Matt Hickey wrote in CrunchGear:

It’s thinner than the current model, for sure, with a more MacBook Air-like bezeling. It’s got stereo speakers on the back and what appears to be the same screen as the current generation. But the real news here isn’t the Exchange support, but the front facing camera for iChat AV.

Aug 20

This isn’t an April Fool’s gag. The next installment of Grand Theft Auto is on its way, and like The Lost and Damned and Chinatown Wars, it’s still set in the massive world of GTA IV. Rockstar has unleashed a surprise announcement with The Ballad of Gay Tony coming this fall for $19.99, or 1600 Microsoft Points.

(Credit:
Rockstar Games)

Together, those almost add up to a GTA IV sequel. Perhaps this really is the future of game publishing: build a world once and populate it many times over. On a side note, we wonder if this bit of pre-E3 info is a sign of E309 to come. Will the lousy economy equal more DLC and less standalone content? We shall see soon enough.

The character in focus this time is Luis Lopez, an assistant to Gay Tony, or Tony Prince, Liberty City’s premier nightclub entrepreneur. The glitz-addled world could be a little dose of Vice City-style mayhem. According to Rockstar Games founder Sam Houser, expect a “focus on high-end night life.” And, according to the press release, expect “uncertainty about who is real and who is fake in a world in which everyone has a price.”

Also announced was the release of both The Lost and Damned and Gay Tony episodes in a single standalone disc-based game called Grand Theft Auto: Episodes from Liberty City. At $39.99, it will cost the same as both DLC (downloadable content) episodes, plus it will have a physical disc and box, and will not require GTA IV to dig into its seedy pleasures.

GTA goes gay for the holidays.

Aug 20

The Democratic-controlled Senate handed President Bush a major political victory on Wednesday by voting to derail lawsuits against telecommunications companies that unlawfully opened their networks to the National Security Agency.

Opponents of the bill said it would allow Bush to cover up illegal warrantless wiretapping. “If Congress short-circuits these lawsuits, we will have lost a prime opportunity to finally achieve accountability for these years of law-breaking,” said Sen. Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat who is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “That’s why the administration has been fighting so hard for this immunity.”

Kevin Bankston, an EFF staff attorney, says his group will continue to pursue its lawsuit. “We’ll be challenging the constitutionality of this law,” he said. “We think it unconstitutionally violates separation of powers and due process… We are going to be challenging this immunity as unconstitutional.”

It’s not yet clear what this means for the lawsuits against telecommunications companies, including one that the Electronic Frontier Foundation brought against AT&T that is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

Many of those efforts were aimed at Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, who told us half a year ago that he would definitely not support retroactive immunity. That was then. Now he does–and he voted for the final bill on Wednesday.

The first is that the company provided assistance “in connection with an intelligence activity” authorized by the president between September 11, 2001 and January 17, 2007, when the wiretap program was altered to include more judicial oversight. The second condition involves a company that received a “written request” from the U.S. Justice Department saying the activity was lawful and authorized by the president. (AT&T has suggested once, and twice, that such a paper trail exists.)

Under Sec. 802 of the Senate bill, which amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, no lawsuit may proceed against any “electronic communication service provider” if either one of two conditions is met.

Sen. Hillary Clinton voted against it. Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, wasn’t present for the vote but has repeatedly stressed his support for the measure (including in our voters’ guide published earlier this year).

Senators voted 69 to 28 for the bill, which would rewrite federal wiretap laws by granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies as long as the government claims the request was “lawful” and authorized by the president.

Earlier, by a 32-66 vote, the Senate rejected an amendment that would have removed the portion of the legislation offering retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that engaged in illegal activities. The U.S. House of Representatives already approved the underlying legislation last month.

Wednesday’s vote followed a last-minute effort by liberal and libertarian activists to convince enough Democrats to kill or modify the bill. DailyKos called the bill “a pardon to Bush”; some activists created a Wiki to hone their message; a Salon columnist dubbed the bill a “coverup of surveillance crimes.”

Aug 20

Verizon first announced plans for an open development network in November with the hope that it would make it easier and less expensive for third-party developers to bring new devices and applications to its network. Ultimately, Verizon hopes its open network will help spur innovation and provide a testing ground for new devices, applications, and services.

A chance to experiment
McAdam said he sees the open development network as a testing ground for the company to experiment with new services and business models. For example, he said the company is already considering a subscription model that would allow a single user to use multiple devices on the network while paying for a single subscription.

“The U.S. market has been conditioned to have the carrier control the wireless network end to end,” Lowell McAdam, Verizon Wireless’ CEO and president, said in an interview at Verizon’s Open Handset Development Conference here. “We’ll have to see how willing people are to give up the subsidy and pay $200 or $300 for a device. We think it will take a long time before the old model dies.”

Verizon’s move to create a more open network comes at a time when everyone from application developers to handset makers to customers to government officials are insisting on more openness. Apple’s iPhone, which generated more buzz than any other consumer electronics device in recent memory, has proven that some segments of the market don’t care about having their phone subsidized. But Apple’s exclusive contract with AT&T has also spawned debate over whether the device should be locked to a specific carrier’s network.

“We don’t want to be a barrier to entry,” McAdam said. “But as all of you can appreciate, with 65 million customers and billions of dollars of investment in our network, we need to protect our customers and our assets.”

But there has also been pressure from regulators and lawmakers, who are considering regulation and laws that would require service providers such as Verizon to be more open. In the Federal Communications Commission’s 700MHz spectrum auction, which ended Tuesday, the government required operators winning licenses on one particular block of spectrum to make their network open to any device.

But in the short term, some Chinese handset manufacturers may find it easier and cheaper to get their handsets to market. The open network could also help Nokia get some of its high-end N series devices into the U.S. market. And it could potentially provide a window of opportunity for companies developing handsets and applications based on Google’s Android platform.

Traditionally, cell phone operators have tightly controlled the entire cell phone experience–from the network to the handsets to the applications running on those devices. But now Verizon, and others like AT&T, are looking for ways to open up their networks.

NEW YORK–Verizon Wireless unveiled specifications for its new open wireless program Wednesday as part of a strategy that could change the future of the wireless market. But the road ahead will likely be a long and slow one.

Testing requirements loosened
As part of the open development program, Verizon has released specifications and best practices for new devices and applications that can be used on its network. The new specifications only allow customers to bring any CDMA (code division multiple access) or EV-DO (evolution data optimized) phone to its network if it’s been precertified by Verizon. But the testing requirements are much less, the company said. And the time it takes to get through the process is greatly reduced. For example, the testing period for the open network is expected to take roughly four weeks, compared with the three to four months that it takes to fully test a device on Verizon’s traditional network.

On the application front, Internet search giant Google announced plans to develop an open operating system it calls Android to help handset developers and carriers bring new applications to the market more quickly.

Verizon’s McAdam conceded that the company’s open-network program was motivated in part by some of these developments.

Tony Melone, Verizon Wireless’ chief technology officer, said the testing process isn’t meant to be a profit center for the company. Developers can use Verizon’s testing sites or they can contract with a third-party developer. The goal is to make sure the devices meet basic specifications, which are based on adhering to the CDMA and EV-DO wireless standards, the technologies that are used on Verizon’s network. In addition to these basic requirements, Verizon will also test to ensure that new devices meet E911 specifications such as GPS location proximity.

“When talking about the future of wireless this is a big deal,” said Avi Greengart, research director for mobile devices at Current Analysis. “It enables connected devices that futurists have been talking about forever. All devices will have network connectivity. But in the short term, people will still buy a subsidized phone if they have the choice.”

“I could easily see people connecting three, four, and five devices to the wireless network and they aren’t going to want to pay a $50 subscription on each one of those,” he said. “We aren’t ready to launch any new service plan. But we do have the ability to move to this when the timing is right.”

The new devices won’t have contracts or early-termination fees. And subscribers will be able to choose from Verizon’s existing rate plans. The company also said it will open the network to wholesalers, allowing device makers to become Mobile Virtual Network Operators.

“We are always resistant to government trying to put themselves in the middle of the market,” he said. “That is always a recipe for disaster.”

This new pricing model could work well with Verizon’s new fourth-generation network that uses a technology called Long-Term Evolution, or LTE. The company will be testing the new network later this year and will extend the open-network concept to it as well. It is likely this future network that will truly benefit from openness.

But McAdam said a bigger motivation for creating the open-network program was Verizon’s customers, who are demanding cooler phones and more applications.

“We saw what was happening with the
iPhone and what Google is doing and we listened to what customers wanted,” he said. “We saw this moment in time coming, and we thought if we open this up, it will be great for our customers and great for our shareholders.”

One of the biggest criticisms of Verizon has always been its lack of cool or cutting-edge phones. Traditionally, Verizon has been known as the most stringent carrier about the devices and applications it allows on its network. It also has one of the more rigorous testing processes for device and application developers. A more open network could allow Verizon to offer customers many more handset and application options than it can offer today.

Customers will be able to activate these “open” devices by calling or going online. They will also be able to download applications directly from developers instead of going through a Verizon store.

Analysts agree that Verizon’s new initiative has big long-term implications, but in the short term will have little impact on the market.

Google, which had pushed for the rule, was a bidder on this part of the spectrum, but it’s widely believed Verizon Wireless was the ultimate winner of that spectrum. Winners of the auction aren’t expected to be announced for a few weeks.

Aug 20

CLARKSDALE, Miss.–When in Rome, as they say.

The kid, a 15-year-old named–I believe–Anthony, knocked our socks off. He came out on stage, looking tentative and playing a little timidly at first. And then, suddenly, he just started jamming, and everyone in the place was blown away. This is a major talent in the making.

The Crossroads, where legendary bluesman Robert Johnson is said to have sold his soul to the devil in return for his musical talent, is at the intersection of US-61 and US-49 in Clarksdale, Miss.

It turns out that the club, the Ground Zero Blues Club, is co-owned by actor Morgan Freeman and the father of a friend of mine. Lured by the opportunity to talk with the two of them about airplanes–since I’d heard that Freeman and his business partner were avid pilots–I’d not really thought too much about the Blues.

This was certainly a departure from what most of Road Trip 2008 has been about. But how could I come to the cradle of the Delta Blues and not make a stop to actually listen to some?

For one, the club is a flash-point for fans of the Blues. And Clarksdale, home to the Crossroads, where legendary bluesman Robert Johnson is said to have sold his soul to the devil in return for great musical talent, is why. Right there, at the intersection of US-61 and US-49, now appropriately across the street from a fried chicken chain, there’s a can’t miss it sign with a bunch of guitars held aloft and the word “Crossroads” for all to see.

Silly me.

I couldn’t, that’s how.

Back to the Ground Zero Blues Club, though.

(Credit:
Daniel Terdiman/CNET News.com)

(Credit:
Daniel Terdiman/CNET News.com)

(Credit:
Daniel Terdiman/CNET News.com)

But there’s no actual Blues being played there. And good thing, too. In keeping with Mississippi’s reality as one of the poorest, most neglected states in the nation, the Crossroads site is right next to a several abandoned lots and there’s rubble everywhere. As Luckett told me, someone had said to him recently that Clarksdale was reminiscent of Beirut. And I can sort of agree.

The truth is, I’m not much of a Blues aficionado. To be sure, I’ve seen a few shows in my day: B.B. King in Jerusalem; John Lee Hooker once or twice; and a couple of other concerts. And I’d certainly listened to my share of Stevie Ray Vaughan.

The stage at the Ground Zero Blue Club in Clarksdale, Miss. The club is home to nightly Blues shows and is co-owned by attorney Bill Luckett and actor Morgan Freeman.

We spent Friday night there, listening to a signer called Razor Blade wail away. And it was just great. He was the real deal: old, weathered skin, a rich deep voice, a great fedora on his head and an unbelievable apprentice helping him out.

The exterior of the Ground Zero Blues Club, which I drove to in my Subaru Outback 2.5 XT. The club is only eight years old, but has the look of a club that has been running continuously for many, many years.

Please stay tuned to the rest of Road Trip 2008, here on this blog, and on my Twitter feed, and my Qik channel.

Afterward, I got back on the road, heading for New Orleans on US-61, the Blues Highway and a lush green respite from the Interstates that I’ve mostly had to drive on this journey.

In the end, Freeman wasn’t in town, as he is in New York performing in a play. But my host, attorney Bill Luckett, treated me to an evening at his club, and I will readily admit that it was an experience to remember.

The club itself is only eight years old, but already it is attracting visitors from all over the country and the world. I’m sure Freeman’s involvement is a big part of that, but it’s mainly because it’s home to the real Blues: unpretentious, fantastic music that appeals to a diverse crowd that mixes with little regard to the racial politics that have always been so prevalent in Mississippi.

But when I planned to come to Clarksdale, Blues was not my highest priority.

As part of Road Trip 2008, my journey through the South in search of several weeks’ worth of stories, I had accepted an invitation to come to this tiny town in northwest Mississippi for the opportunity to visit one of the most important Blues clubs in the country.

Aug 20

Today, Sharpcast is launching the public beta of its new file synchronization product, SugarSync (download it from Download.com). Like other sync tools (FolderShare [recently updated] and BeInSync), it performs the useful service of automatically keeping the data on one PC the same as on another. This is a great service for people who use more than one PC — a laptop and a desktop, for example. It can also be used as a crude workgroup file system (see Groove). I got a tour of the product recently from Sharpcast CEO Gibu Thomas and took some time to experiment with it afterwards.

There’s also a
Mac client.

There are advantages: Since files are stored online, SugarSync is a viable online backup product. It’s a bit feature-light in that regard (there’s no version tracking of files, and no system rebuild function), but still workable. Also, the product’s servers can transcode files for display or playback on other devices: If you try to view a synced picture on a mobile device, SugarSync only displays the small version of it, and your PC doesn’t have to be on to serve or upload the file. And with server-based sync, not only do you not have to make sure your multiple PCs are on at the same time to make the sync work, you also get Web access to your files even when all your personal PCs are off. You can also share files from the Web service directly, and SugarSync has a nice utility for making sharable photo galleries (example).

With your data stored on a server, though, there’s a security concern. All SugarSync data is encrypted both on the servers and in transit, but guess who holds the encryption keys? SugarSync. While they are stored separately, there’s no way an individual can protect the company from accessing his or her data. Thomas told me Sharpcast may offer users the capability to set their own encryption keys in the future.

There's a good mobile site as well as a dedicated smartphone app.

Setup and configuration really couldn't be easier.

SugarSync also has a strong mobile component. Not only can you view your synced files on your smartphone, but there’s a mobile app that hooks into your phone’s camera and will automatically upload new pictures to a directory on your PCs. The Windows smartphone app I tried was fast and easy to use, unlike many other mobile media access products I’ve seen that are Web-based and a little clunky.

(Credit:
Rafe Needleman)

SugarSync is a unique product. Properly configured, it can give its users access to all their data from anywhere — any computer they own or any Web-connected device. It can completely free users from caring where their data is stored, and that’s a powerful thing. And while it’s a great “hard drive in the sky,” it doesn’t force you to change your work habits and rely solely on online storage.

It is, however, expensive, unless it’s used only to store a small subset of a users’ files. That’s counter to the product’s philosophy: you have to think about what you’re going to sync and what not. Until the price comes down to a real-world level at realistic storage capacities, SugarSync won’t reasonably do for many people what it would actually be best at.

Despite its middleman architecture, when both sender and receiver are online, SugarSync is incredibly fast — faster than FolderShare, which I’ve been using for years. However, there is quite literally a price for server-moderated sync: Someone’s got to pay for the storage and the bandwidth on the SugarSync servers. P2P sync products that simply connect users’ PCs together can more realistically be run as free or flat-rate services, but SugarSync will cost $49 a year for 10GB of storage; $149 a year for 100GB.

SugarSync can make hosted online photo galleries that are synchronized to your PC or Mac hard disk.

SugarSync has another advantage not related to its architecture: It’s incredibly easy and straightforward to set up. By default it creates a “Magic Briefcase” folder on each of your systems that’s kept in sync among your devices, but you can also point the product at any other directories you like.

SugarSync is very different from computer-to-computer sync tools like FolderShare and BeInSync. These systems allow multiple PCs to update each other directly. But they can only transfer files when both PCs are online at the same time. SugarSync uses a Web-based clearinghouse for files: Everything you want to sync goes up to a server in the sky, and when another computer you’re keeping in sync comes online, it connects to the server to get and send the latest file updates.

Aug 20

Much like Dopplr, which we peeked at last month, the whole idea behind the alerts is to let you know when your buddies (Tripit calls them “colleagues”) will be in town or traveling in or around the same place at the same time. The only things existing Tripit users need to do to get in on the alerts are a) have at least five other people as friends and b) make and share their travel plans either publicly, or by inviting their friends as viewers.

There is certainly a lot of potential for these services, especially if you’ve got a large social graph and wouldn’t mind unexpectedly seeing your friends while traveling. It certainly beats a flight out just to see them, and assuming everyone uses the service, you might have a reasonable rate of success.

If you've got people close by on other trips, Tripit will now let you know with its location-based travel alerts.

Tripit, which I mentioned in an earlier post about Planjam, is a do-it-all travel service that helps people organize their travel plans (flight numbers,
car rental info, accommodations, etc.) in one central location that can be updated and accessed on the go. Today they’re launching a new feature called “closeness” alerts.

So how do the new closeness alerts affect privacy? What if you don’t want other people to see that you’re going on a trip? The good news is that the closeness alerts are setup the same way as any other trip on Tripit, meaning that if your trip is marked as private, the only other Tripit members who will be able to see it are those you invite to participate.

(Credit:
TripIt, Inc. / CNET Networks)

« Previous Entries